0.10/0.15 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_24709 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.10/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 12:47:39 EDT 2023 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.23/0.54 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K6PelOvyAb/Vampire---4.8_24709 0.23/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.51/0.60 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHSA. 0.51/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.51/0.60 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting sh4 with 360s (2) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting full_lambda_7 with 180s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # full_lambda_7 with pid 24890 completed with status 0 0.51/0.60 # Result found by full_lambda_7 0.51/0.60 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHSA. 0.51/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.51/0.60 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting sh4 with 360s (2) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting full_lambda_7 with 180s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true) 0.51/0.60 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN 0.51/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.51/0.60 # Starting full_lambda_3 with 83s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # full_lambda_3 with pid 24891 completed with status 0 0.51/0.60 # Result found by full_lambda_3 0.51/0.60 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHSA. 0.51/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.51/0.60 # Starting pre_casc_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting sh4 with 360s (2) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting pre_casc_4 with 180s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # Starting full_lambda_7 with 180s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true) 0.51/0.60 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN 0.51/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.51/0.60 # Starting full_lambda_3 with 83s (1) cores 0.51/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s 0.51/0.60 0.51/0.60 # Proof found! 0.51/0.60 # SZS status Theorem 0.51/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_22, type, binary717961607le_T_a: binary1439146945Tree_a > a > binary1439146945Tree_a > binary1439146945Tree_a). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_27, type, binary339557810e_rm_a: (a > int) > binary1439146945Tree_a > a). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_40, type, ord_less_int: int > int > $o). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_49, type, h: a > int). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_50, type, l: a). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_51, type, t1: binary1439146945Tree_a). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_52, type, t2: binary1439146945Tree_a). 0.51/0.60 thf(decl_53, type, x: a). 0.51/0.60 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (ord_less_int @ (h @ l) @ (h @ (binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K6PelOvyAb/Vampire---4.8_24709', conj_0)). 0.51/0.60 thf(fact_1_rm__res, axiom, ((binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2))=(binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ t2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K6PelOvyAb/Vampire---4.8_24709', fact_1_rm__res)). 0.51/0.60 thf(fact_0_hLess, axiom, (ord_less_int @ (h @ l) @ (h @ (binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ t2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K6PelOvyAb/Vampire---4.8_24709', fact_0_hLess)). 0.51/0.60 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(ord_less_int @ (h @ l) @ (h @ (binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.51/0.60 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~((ord_less_int @ (h @ l) @ (h @ (binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.51/0.60 thf(c_0_5, plain, ((binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2))=(binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ t2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_rm__res])). 0.51/0.60 thf(c_0_6, plain, (ord_less_int @ (h @ l) @ (h @ (binary339557810e_rm_a @ h @ t2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_hLess])). 0.51/0.60 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_6])]), ['proof']). 0.51/0.60 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.51/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 389 0.51/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 120 0.51/0.60 # Initial clauses : 546 0.51/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5 0.51/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 541 0.51/0.60 # Processed clauses : 4 0.51/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.51/0.60 # ...subsumed : 0 0.51/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 4 0.51/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.51/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.51/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.51/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.51/0.60 # Generated clauses : 1 0.51/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.51/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.51/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.51/0.60 # Paramodulations : 1 0.51/0.60 # Factorizations : 0 0.51/0.60 # NegExts : 0 0.51/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.51/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 1 0.51/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.51/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0 0.51/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.51/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.51/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.51/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.51/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.51/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.51/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.51/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.51/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.51/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.51/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 4 0.51/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 0.51/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.51/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.51/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.51/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 537 0.51/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 1945 0.51/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.51/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 0 0.51/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.51/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.51/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.51/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.51/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.51/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.51/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.51/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 4 0.51/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0 0.51/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 55850 0.51/0.60 0.51/0.60 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.51/0.60 # User time : 0.038 s 0.51/0.60 # System time : 0.010 s 0.51/0.60 # Total time : 0.049 s 0.51/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 4248 pages 0.56/0.60 0.56/0.60 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.56/0.60 # User time : 0.050 s 0.56/0.60 # System time : 0.013 s 0.56/0.60 # Total time : 0.063 s 0.56/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2484 pages 0.56/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting 0.56/0.61 EOF